[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190329083920.GA21152@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:39:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
"fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "bhe@...hat.com" <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"kasong@...hat.com" <kasong@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:05:52AM +0000, Junichi Nomura wrote:
> > You don't need that variable and can return "table" or 0 after the endif
> > below.
>
> I could do that but it will slightly change the current logic.
>
> Existing code does this:
>
> if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
> rsdp_addr = table;
> else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
> return table;
>
> I thought it was to return the table for ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID
> if both tables exist. If we remove rsdp_addr, the code will be:
>
> if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
> return table;
> else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
> return table;
>
> So if there are 2 tables, we return the one that comes first.
> Is it ok?
That's a good question.
Chao, what was the intention there, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID is the preferred
table to return? If so, why?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists