linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers/base/memory.c: Rename the misleading parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:36:59 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, rafael@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mhocko@...e.com, osalvador@...e.de, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
        willy@...radead.org, fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] drivers/base/memory.c: Rename the misleading parameter

The input parameter 'phys_index' of memory_block_action() is actually
the section number, but not the phys_index of memory_block. This is
a relict from the past when one memory block could only contain one
section.

Rename it to start_section_nr.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
 drivers/base/memory.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
index cb8347500ce2..9ea972b2ae79 100644
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c
+++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -231,13 +231,14 @@ static bool pages_correctly_probed(unsigned long start_pfn)
  * OK to have direct references to sparsemem variables in here.
  */
 static int
-memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_type)
+memory_block_action(unsigned long start_section_nr, unsigned long action,
+		    int online_type)
 {
 	unsigned long start_pfn;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = PAGES_PER_SECTION * sections_per_block;
 	int ret;
 
-	start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(phys_index);
+	start_pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(start_section_nr);
 
 	switch (action) {
 	case MEM_ONLINE:
@@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ memory_block_action(unsigned long phys_index, unsigned long action, int online_t
 		break;
 	default:
 		WARN(1, KERN_WARNING "%s(%ld, %ld) unknown action: "
-		     "%ld\n", __func__, phys_index, action, action);
+		     "%ld\n", __func__, start_section_nr, action, action);
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.2