[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e204d90a-e5ee-fd8e-afcd-624b4a3bd0b2@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:43:31 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: move KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS to common code
On 28.03.19 18:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> All architectures except MIPS were defining it in the same way,
> and memory slots are handled entirely by common code so there
> is no point in keeping the definition per-architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 5 ++---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 3 ---
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 3 ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ---
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 3 ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index 67068c47c591..b62ad0d94234 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -1117,9 +1117,8 @@ struct kvm_userspace_memory_region {
> This ioctl allows the user to create, modify or delete a guest physical
> memory slot. Bits 0-15 of "slot" specify the slot id and this value
> should be less than the maximum number of user memory slots supported per
> -VM. The maximum allowed slots can be queried using KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS,
> -if this capability is supported by the architecture. Slots may not
> -overlap in guest physical address space.
> +VM. The maximum allowed slots can be queried using KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS.
> +Slots may not overlap in guest physical address space.
>
> If KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE is available, bits 16-31 of "slot"
> specifies the address space which is being modified. They must be
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 8885377ec3e0..92910b7c5bcc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -644,9 +644,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> else
> r = num_online_cpus();
> break;
> - case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
> - r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
> - break;
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
> r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> break;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 4638303ba6a8..28f35d2b06cb 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -513,9 +513,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> else if (sclp.has_esca && sclp.has_64bscao)
> r = KVM_S390_ESCA_CPU_SLOTS;
> break;
> - case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
> - r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
> - break;
> case KVM_CAP_S390_COW:
> r = MACHINE_HAS_ESOP;
> break;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 099b851dabaf..9b64d3359c93 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -3073,9 +3073,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
> r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> break;
> - case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
> - r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
> - break;
> case KVM_CAP_PV_MMU: /* obsolete */
> r = 0;
> break;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 99c37384ba7b..be4ec5f3ba5f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -224,9 +224,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
> r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
> break;
> - case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
> - r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
> - break;
> case KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID:
> if (!kvm)
> r = -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 55fe8e20d8fd..31c28e0b067c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -3061,6 +3061,8 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
> #endif
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
> return KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
> + case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
> + return KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
> default:
> break;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists