[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190329103039.GA44339@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:30:40 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 04/20] mm, arm64: untag user pointers passed to
memory syscalls
(I trimmed down the cc list a bit since it's always bouncing)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 02:19:34PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:10:07 +0100
> Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > ipc/shm.c | 2 ++
> > > > mm/madvise.c | 2 ++
> > > > mm/mempolicy.c | 5 +++++
> > > > mm/migrate.c | 1 +
> > > > mm/mincore.c | 2 ++
> > > > mm/mlock.c | 5 +++++
> > > > mm/mmap.c | 7 +++++++
> > > > mm/mprotect.c | 1 +
> > > > mm/mremap.c | 2 ++
> > > > mm/msync.c | 2 ++
> > > > 10 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > I wonder whether it's better to keep these as wrappers in the arm64
> > > code.
> >
> > I don't think I understand what you propose, could you elaborate?
>
> I believe Catalin is saying that instead of placing things like:
>
> @@ -1593,6 +1593,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(shmat, int, shmid, char __user *, shmaddr, int, shmflg)
> unsigned long ret;
> long err;
>
> + shmaddr = untagged_addr(shmaddr);
>
> To instead have the shmaddr set to the untagged_addr() before calling
> the system call, and passing the untagged addr to the system call, as
> that goes through the arm64 architecture specific code first.
Indeed. For example, we already have a SYSCALL_DEFINE6(mmap, ...) in
arch/arm64/kernel/sys.c, just add the untagging there. We could do
something similar for the other syscalls. I don't mind doing this in the
generic code but if it's only needed for arm64, I'd rather keep the
generic changes to a minimum.
(I had a hack overriding __SC_CAST to do this automatically for pointer
arguments but this wouldn't work on mmap() and friends as the argument
is unsigned long)
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists