linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR10MB235256E1840C1E594ECDC0A5FE5A0@VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:02:25 +0000
From:   Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data

Hi,

On 18 March 2019 15:48 Wolfram Sang wrote:

> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] mfd: da9063: remove platform_data
> 
> When working with this driver while debugging something else, I noticed that
> there are no in-kernel users of platform_data anymore. Removing the support
> simplifies the code and gets rid of quite some lines. The biggest refactoring
> went to the regulator driver which could maybe benefit from more
> refactorization. However, there is no in-kernel user of that driver, so no
> testing. I left it at this stage. I think the changes are still at a level
> where review and build-testing will give enough confidence.
> 
> Besides the regulator thing, it was tested on a Renesas Lager board (R-Car H2).
> No regressions encountered. buildbot was happy, too.
> 
> The patches are based on v5.1-rc1. I'd vote for all of them going through the
> MFD tree. Looking forward to comments!
> 
>    Wolfram

I've acked-by and tested-by for all the patches now. Apologies because it took
such a long time to get around to looking at this.

(For my benefit) I regression tested against v5.0 and v5.1-rc1, ok.

Thanks,
Steve