linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/timer: Don't inline __const

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190330004743.29541-4-andi@firstfloor.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:47:38 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:     x86@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] x86/timer: Don't inline __const_udelay

From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>

LTO will happily inline __const_udelay everywhere it is used.
Forcing it noinline saves ~44k text in a LTO build.

13999560        1740864 1499136 17239560        1070e08 vmlinux-with-udelay-inline
13954764        1736768 1499136 17190668        1064f0c vmlinux-wo-udelay-inline

Even without LTO I believe marking it noinline documents it correctly.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/lib/delay.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index f5b7f1b3b6d7..b7375dc6898f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ void __delay(unsigned long loops)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
 
-void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
+noinline void __const_udelay(unsigned long xloops)
 {
 	unsigned long lpj = this_cpu_read(cpu_info.loops_per_jiffy) ? : loops_per_jiffy;
 	int d0;
-- 
2.20.1