lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190330071413.GA5507@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:14:13 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@...il.com>
Cc:     jslaby@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: a kernel address leak via copy_to_user in drivers/tty/rocket.c

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 03:05:11PM +0800, Fuqian Huang wrote:
> Hi, recently I found that there is a kernel address leaks to user
> space via copy_to_user in
> drivers/tty/rocket.c:1287 (linux-5.0.5)
> static int rp_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int cmd, unsigned
> long arg) {
>   ...
>   case RCKP_GET_STRUCT:
>       if (copy_to_user(argp, info, sizeof(struct r_port))
>   ...
> }
> The `info` is a struct r_port. and the field `r_port.port.ops` is an
> constant pointer,
> and it points to a constant object `rocket_port_ops` during the initialization.
> (function init_r_port) (drivers/tty/rocket.c:633)
> 
> patch suggestion:
> set the pointer field to null before the copy to user call.

Great, can you send a patch to fix this so that you get the proper
credit for finding and resolving it?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ