linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix error directive in argument list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190330084016.24f8ad46@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:40:16 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc:     Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
        roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix  error directive in argument list

On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 13:01:41 +0100
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com> wrote:

> OK, I see. IMO, it would be better to have 2 patches for this:
> one for the redundant assignment to pin6 and anotther one for
> the IS_ENABLED() change but feel free, if needed, to add my

I agree with it being separate patches. I'm big on the "one patch
accomplishes one task" ideology.

-- Steve