[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e2d8ab93c97acf1254830e6f51edb8f19c8767d6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 09:27:32 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Rushikesh S Kadam <rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com>,
Nick Crews <ncrews@...omium.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org,
jettrink@...omium.org, Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] HID: intel-ish-hid: ISH firmware loader client driver
On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 15:52 +0530, Rushikesh S Kadam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 04:30:18PM -0700, Nick Crews wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 1:03 PM Rushikesh S Kadam
> > <rushikesh.s.kadam@...el.com> wrote:
> > > + ldr_xfer_ipc_frag = kzalloc(LOADER_SHIM_IPC_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!ldr_xfer_ipc_frag) {
> > Log error here.
> The error code is logged in calling function
> load_fw_from_host(). Is that good enough?
>
> I believe the checkpatch script too, would
> recommend against adding debug print for ENOMEM
> error.
The generic kernel allocation functions already do
a dump_stack() on OOM conditions when called without
__GFP_NOWARN so any additional OOM message isn't
particularly useful.
> Again, I thought it was against practise to log
> "out of memory" debug prints in probe()
Or anywhere else given the generic OOM stack dump.
> But will add if you tell me this is the right way.
>
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + loader_ishtp_cl = ishtp_cl_allocate(cl_device);
> > > + if (!loader_ishtp_cl)
> >
> > log error here
The ishtp_cl_allocate function just calls kmalloc then
initializes the struct so an additional OOM message
isn't useful here either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists