[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190330000854.30142-4-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 17:08:54 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] locking/static_key: don't take sleeping locks in __static_key_slow_dec_deferred()
Changing jump_label state is protected by jump_label_lock().
Rate limited static_key_slow_dec(), however, will never
directly call jump_label_update(), it will schedule a delayed
work instead. Therefore it's unnecessary to take both the
cpus_read_lock() and jump_label_lock().
This allows static_key_slow_dec_deferred() to be called
from atomic contexts, like socket destructing in net/tls,
without the need for another indirection.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
---
kernel/jump_label.c | 32 +++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c
index 02c3d11264dd..de6efdecc70d 100644
--- a/kernel/jump_label.c
+++ b/kernel/jump_label.c
@@ -221,9 +221,7 @@ static bool static_key_slow_try_dec(struct static_key *key)
return true;
}
-static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key,
- unsigned long rate_limit,
- struct delayed_work *work)
+static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
{
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
@@ -231,23 +229,15 @@ static void __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key,
return;
jump_label_lock();
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&key->enabled)) {
- if (rate_limit) {
- atomic_inc(&key->enabled);
- schedule_delayed_work(work, rate_limit);
- } else {
- jump_label_update(key);
- }
- }
+ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&key->enabled))
+ jump_label_update(key);
jump_label_unlock();
}
-static void __static_key_slow_dec(struct static_key *key,
- unsigned long rate_limit,
- struct delayed_work *work)
+static void __static_key_slow_dec(struct static_key *key)
{
cpus_read_lock();
- __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key, rate_limit, work);
+ __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key);
cpus_read_unlock();
}
@@ -255,21 +245,21 @@ void jump_label_update_timeout(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct static_key_deferred *key =
container_of(work, struct static_key_deferred, work.work);
- __static_key_slow_dec(&key->key, 0, NULL);
+ __static_key_slow_dec(&key->key);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(jump_label_update_timeout);
void static_key_slow_dec(struct static_key *key)
{
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
- __static_key_slow_dec(key, 0, NULL);
+ __static_key_slow_dec(key);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_dec);
void static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *key)
{
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
- __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key, 0, NULL);
+ __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key);
}
void __static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key *key,
@@ -277,7 +267,11 @@ void __static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key *key,
unsigned long timeout)
{
STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key);
- __static_key_slow_dec(key, timeout, work);
+
+ if (static_key_slow_try_dec(key))
+ return;
+
+ schedule_delayed_work(work, timeout);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__static_key_slow_dec_deferred);
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists