[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1554076559-14873-1-git-send-email-mikelley@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 23:57:28 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: storvsc: Fix calculation of sub-channel count
When the number of sub-channels offered by Hyper-V is >= the number
of CPUs in the VM, calculate the correct number of sub-channels.
The current code produces one too many.
This scenario arises only when the number of CPUs is artificially
restricted (for example, with maxcpus=<n> on the kernel boot line),
because Hyper-V normally offers a sub-channel count < number of CPUs.
While the current code doesn't break, the extra sub-channel is
unbalanced across the CPUs (for example, a total of 5 channels on
a VM with 4 CPUs).
Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
---
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index 84380ba..fbaa11a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -674,7 +674,17 @@ static void handle_multichannel_storage(struct hv_device *device, int max_chns)
struct vstor_packet *vstor_packet;
int ret, t;
- num_sc = ((max_chns > num_cpus) ? num_cpus : max_chns);
+ /*
+ * If the number of CPUs is artificially restricted, such as
+ * with maxcpus=1 on the kernel boot line, Hyper-V could offer
+ * sub-channels >= the number of CPUs. These sub-channels
+ * should not be created. The primary channel is already created
+ * and assigned to one CPU, so check against # CPUs - 1.
+ */
+ num_sc = min((num_cpus - 1), max_chns);
+ if (!num_sc)
+ return;
+
stor_device = get_out_stor_device(device);
if (!stor_device)
return;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists