[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c01bd62-7aee-3a84-0af0-e07f1801b571@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:36:03 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
To: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm/mach-at91/pm : fix possible object reference leak
On 4/1/2019 4:50 PM, Peng Hao wrote:
> of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the struct device
> when it finds a match via get_device. When returning error we should
> call put_device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 51e808a..b60fcc9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static int __init at91_pm_backup_init(void)
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-securam");
> if (!np)
> - goto securam_fail;
> + goto securam_fail_1;
>
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> of_node_put(np);
I think you missed the label in
if (!pdev)
goto securam_fail_1
Please fix that and also if possible give some proper name to the label.
Cheers,
Mukesh
> @@ -620,6 +620,8 @@ static int __init at91_pm_backup_init(void)
> return 0;
>
> securam_fail:
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +securam_fail_1:
> iounmap(pm_data.sfrbu);
> pm_data.sfrbu = NULL;
> return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists