linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] Lib: sort.h: replace int size with size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:22:29 +0000
From:   Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Andrey Abramov <st5pub@...dex.ru>,
        David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
        "'gregkh@...uxfoundation.org'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     George Spelvin <lkml@....org>,
        "adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        "ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "darrick.wong@...cle.com" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        "dchinner@...hat.com" <dchinner@...hat.com>,
        "dedekind1@...il.com" <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "jlbec@...lplan.org" <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "mark@...heh.com" <mark@...heh.com>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Lib: sort.h: replace int size with size_t size in
 the swap function

On 4/1/19 11:14 AM, Andrey Abramov wrote:
> George Spelvin wrote "So how about *deleting* the parameter instead?
> That simplifies everything.", and he is right,
> so I am just going to completely remove it.
>
> Any objections?

LGTM.