lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0402MB2727C7111A5BDBB07F05E29886550@DB6PR0402MB2727.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 19:09:02 +0000
From:   Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: of_reserved_mem()/kexec interaction

Hi Rob,

Not sure if you're the right person to address this to but if not
hopefully someone on the list can assist me.

I'm trying to understand if memory reserved in the device tree via the
"reserved-memory" facility is preserved during a kexec system call,
i.e., is the memory at the same location with the contents undisturbed
when the new kernel starts?

Thanks

Roy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ