[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190401155939.66ad1f8ad999fde514002e66@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:59:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/1] improve vmap allocation
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:03:47 +0200 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello, Andrew.
>
> >
> > It's a lot of new code. I t looks decent and I'll toss it in there for
> > further testing. Hopefully someone will be able to find the time for a
> > detailed review.
> >
> I have got some proposals and comments about simplifying the code a bit.
> So i am about to upload the v3 for further review. I see that your commit
> message includes whole details and explanation:
>
> http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmotm.git/commit/?id=b6ac5ca4c512094f217a8140edeea17e6621b2ad
>
> Should i base on and keep it in v3?
>
It's probably best to do a clean resend at this stage. I'll take a
look at the deltas and updating changelogs, etc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists