linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] spi: spi-fsl-spi: try to make cpu-mode transfers faster

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190401073450.GG2059@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:34:50 +0700
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Cc:     "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] spi: spi-fsl-spi: try to make cpu-mode transfers
 faster

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:30:48PM +0000, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> I doubt patches 3 and 4 are acceptable, but I'd still like to get
> comments and/or alternative suggestions for making large transfers
> faster.

I see no problem with this from a framework point of view FWIW, it's
going to be a question of if there's any glitches like you say.  I'm not
sure how we can get wider testing/review unless the patches actually get
merged though...  I'll leave them for a bit longer but unless someone
sees a problem I'll probably go ahead and apply them.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)