| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hDyx6t8UXj=tO78YUTMBqmdnNWEjs4SVwBoJya9pHu4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:31:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drivers/cpufreq: Convert some slow-path
static_cpu_has() callers to boot_cpu_has()
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the
> boot_cpu_has() variant.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
> index 4ac7c3cf34be..6927a8c0e748 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd_freq_sensitivity.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int __init amd_freq_sensitivity_init(void)
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_KERNCZ_SMBUS, NULL);
>
> if (!pcidev) {
> - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK))
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PROC_FEEDBACK))
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index e22f0dbaebb1..ea62e3f02d56 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ static s16 intel_pstate_get_epb(struct cpudata *cpu_data)
> u64 epb;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB))
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> ret = rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu_data->cpu, MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, &epb);
> @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static s16 intel_pstate_get_epp(struct cpudata *cpu_data, u64 hwp_req_data)
> {
> s16 epp;
>
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> /*
> * When hwp_req_data is 0, means that caller didn't read
> * MSR_HWP_REQUEST, so need to read and get EPP.
> @@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_epb(int cpu, s16 pref)
> u64 epb;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB))
> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> ret = rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, &epb);
> @@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_energy_pref_index(struct cpudata *cpu_data)
> if (epp < 0)
> return epp;
>
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> if (epp == HWP_EPP_PERFORMANCE)
> return 1;
> if (epp <= HWP_EPP_BALANCE_PERFORMANCE)
> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_get_energy_pref_index(struct cpudata *cpu_data)
> return 3;
> else
> return 4;
> - } else if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB)) {
> + } else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EPB)) {
> /*
> * Range:
> * 0x00-0x03 : Performance
> @@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_energy_pref_index(struct cpudata *cpu_data,
>
> mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
>
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> u64 value;
>
> ret = rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu_data->cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, &value);
> @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_set(unsigned int cpu)
> epp = cpu_data->epp_powersave;
> }
> update_epp:
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) {
> value &= ~GENMASK_ULL(31, 24);
> value |= (u64)epp << 24;
> } else {
> @@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(int cpu)
> value |= HWP_MIN_PERF(min_perf);
>
> /* Set EPP/EPB to min */
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP))
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP))
> value |= HWP_ENERGY_PERF_PREFERENCE(HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE);
> else
> intel_pstate_set_epb(cpu, HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE);
> @@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static void __init intel_pstate_sysfs_expose_params(void)
> static void intel_pstate_hwp_enable(struct cpudata *cpudata)
> {
> /* First disable HWP notification interrupt as we don't process them */
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_NOTIFY))
> wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_HWP_INTERRUPT, 0x00);
>
> wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpudata->cpu, MSR_PM_ENABLE, 0x1);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> index fb77b39a4ce3..3c12e03fa343 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
> @@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ static int powernowk8_init(void)
> unsigned int i, supported_cpus = 0;
> int ret;
>
> - if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE)) {
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE)) {
> __request_acpi_cpufreq();
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists