[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrX1ZtZE2JUgXD55vZgwxpO2pTiUJb_GKDXAJJd4VTyGSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2019 21:03:42 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/14] x86/exceptions: Add guard patches to IST stacks
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 3:10 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> While looking for something different I stumbled over the comment in struct
> cpu_entry_area:
>
> * Exception stacks used for IST entries.
> *
> * In the future, this should have a separate slot for each stack
> * with guard pages between them.
>
> As usual with such comments they are added in good faith and then
> forgotten. Looking what it takes to fix that let me stumble over some other
> leftovers like orig_ist[], now unused macros, useless defines and a bunch
> of assumptions about the exception stacks being a big lump. Aside of that I
> found a too broad check of the exception stack in the x86/64 stack overflow
> detector.
>
> The following series cleans that up and gradually prepares for guard pages
> between the IST stacks.
Thanks! I'll review this over the next couple days.
Meanwhile, if you're inspired, I have a WIP series to do the same
thing to the IRQ stacks here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/guard_pages
Want to take a look or pick it up if you want to keep working on this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists