linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVsp86n_1+c6NZpCG1MwcAzEH7rgaESHfYESb5YcLk6zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:42:14 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

Hi Steve,

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss
<stwiss.opensource@...semi.com> wrote:
> On 01 April 2019 10:00, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:43 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:15:56AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > The DA9062 and DA9063 have a year register that can go up to 0x3F.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > >
> > > I couldn't test the upper limit (DA9063 hooked to a 32bit system here),
> > > but lower limit works and RTC in general works.
> >
> > BTW, does the RTC alarm interrupt work for you?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions.
>
> I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the
> alarms, I see everything working okay WITHOUT Alexandre's patches ...

Thanks!

I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds