[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR10MB2352ADB7AC634641DD6BAE0AFE550@VI1PR10MB2352.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:00:54 +0000
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
Hi Geert,
On 01 April 2019 13:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions.
> > I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the
> > alarms, I see everything working okay [...]
>
> Thanks!
>
> I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
> but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.
I think I remember, .. was this it?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7022179F236@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com/
I remember previously I wasn't able to quickly provide you with a regression
test result after you fixed an IRQ problem that affected the DA9063 RTC
(thanks for your help on that btw).
Regards,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists