linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:00:54 +0000
From:   Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
CC:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

Hi Geert,

On 01 April 2019 13:42, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:39 PM Steve Twiss wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, there are no RTC alarm regressions.
> > I am using an i.MX6Q board and with an unmodified v5.1-rc1 kernel, for the
> > alarms, I see everything working okay [...]
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
> but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.

I think I remember, .. was this it?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7022179F236@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com/

I remember previously I wasn't able to quickly provide you with a regression
test result after you fixed an IRQ problem that affected the DA9063 RTC
(thanks for your help on that btw).

Regards,
Steve