[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401151352.tf7ljaqpzic6hlj3@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:13:52 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] i2c: remove use of in_atomic()
> Looking at kernel_restart_prepare(), we set SYSTEM_REBOOT in normal
> context, specifically it just did a blocking notifier call.
>
> So no, you'll have to combine the two.
I see now. Combining the two is still readable, but I'll abstract this
away into some 'i2c_is_atomic_xfer_mode()' helper with proper
explanation. Thank you for the input!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists