linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190401151628.GK3430@piout.net>
Date:   Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:16:28 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: da9063: set range

On 01/04/2019 17:07:42+0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> > 
> > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 3:21 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> > > > I was just wondering whether they work for Wolfram, who has a similar
> > > > but different board than I have. Last time I tried, they didn't work for me.
> > >
> > > How did you test?
> > 
> > tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c cfr.
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdWbV2=LfSWz0rFTGRakZ=2iXKOYdM_Uwaov8-OsJpUgoA@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Hmm, with vanilla v5.1-rc3, I don't even get that far:
> 
> [==========] Running 7 tests from 2 test cases.
> [ RUN      ] rtc.date_read
> rtctest.c:49:rtc.date_read:Current RTC date/time is 01/01/2000 04:06:40.
> [       OK ] rtc.date_read
> [ RUN      ] rtc.uie_read
> 
> And here it blocks forever. Any pointers?
>

This means that you don't get any interrupt from your RTC (and that I
have to fix the timeout for uie_read).

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com