[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190401165853.GA1929@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:58:53 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Evalds Iodzevics <evalds.iodzevics@...il.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: missing patch
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:06:29PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 06:13:16PM +0200, Evalds Iodzevics wrote:
> > Hi back in the December of 2016 there was commit
> > "1c52d859cb2d417e7216d3e56bb7fea88444cec9"
> >
> > witch was followed shortly by "c198b121b1a1d7a7171770c634cd49191bac4477"
> >
> > Unfortunately only the first commit was later included in long-term kernel
> > branches such as 4.4 and 4.9 witch left some of microcode functionality
> > broken on 32 bit systems
> >
> > I guess it should be easily fixed by including
> > "c198b121b1a1d7a7171770c634cd49191bac4477" in those branches
>
> Now queued up, thanks!
Hm, no, it causes a bunch of build warnings that look like things are
about to break:
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: do_sync_core()+0x1b: unsupported instruction in callable function
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: text_poke_early()+0x83: unsupported instruction in callable function
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: apply_alternatives()+0x366: unsupported instruction in callable function
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: text_poke()+0x196: unsupported instruction in callable function
So I'm going to drop this patch from both trees now. Can you provide a
working backported version, or find what else needs to be applied as
well for this patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists