| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <67d71ed4-17dc-a4ff-19cd-c49a3f137fc1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:22:29 +0530
From: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmem: core: Set no-read-write provider to avoid
userspace read/write
Hi Srinivas,
Thanks for the patch, Can you please merge , So will cherry pick the same.
Regards
Gaurav
On 3/25/2019 11:45 AM, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>
> On 3/22/2019 11:42 PM, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>> Hi Srinivas,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, Something like this only i have tested in the
>> morning, instead of unused, i have put dev group inside config as well.
>>
>> We will test the exact patch and update the same.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Gaurav
>>
>> On 3/22/2019 8:32 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 20/03/2019 17:50, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is root only option not helping you in this case?
>>>> Yes we want to protect at root level as well, i mean it is better
>>>> if we can avoid exposing to userspace at all.
>>> Can you try below patch!
>>>
> Hi Srinivas,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> I have checked the patch and also tested the same , and it is working
> as expected(no creation of nvmem sysfs)
>
> Applied with some conflict on line 41.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@...eaurora.org>
>
> Regards
>
> Gaurav
>
>
>>>>>
>>>>> We could go down the route of adding new config option something
>>>>> like CONFIG_NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY to prevent adding nvmem entry in
>>>>> userspace.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if you are happy to create a patch for this change?
>>>>
>>>> I am happy with either way config option or dt binding(seems easy),
>>>> please let me know we will post new patch for the same.
>>> DT way is totally NAK.
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------->cut<-----------------------------------
>>>
>>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:15:21 +0000
>>> Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: core: add support to NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY
>>>
>>> Some users might not want to expose nvmem entry to sysfs and
>>> only intend to use kernel interface so add such provision.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem | 2 ++
>>> drivers/nvmem/Kconfig | 5 +++++
>>> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 11 ++++++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
>>> b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
>>> index 5923ab4620c5..12aab0a85fea 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-bus-nvmem
>>> @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ Description:
>>> This file allows user to read/write the raw NVMEM contents.
>>> Permissions for write to this file depends on the nvmem
>>> provider configuration.
>>> + Note: This file is not present if CONFIG_NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY
>>> + is enabled
>>>
>>> ex:
>>> hexdump /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/qfprom0/nvmem
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
>>> index 0a7a470ee859..6ab3276d287c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/Kconfig
>>> @@ -192,4 +192,9 @@ config SC27XX_EFUSE
>>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>>> will be called nvmem-sc27xx-efuse.
>>>
>>> +config NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY
>>> + bool "No nvmem sysfs entry"
>>> +
>>> + help
>>> + Say Yes if you do not want to add nvmem entry to sysfs.
>>> endif
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>>> index b9a0270883a0..c70f183fe379 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>>> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
>>> nvmem_bin_rw_group = {
>>> .attrs = nvmem_attrs,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_rw_dev_groups[] = {
>>> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
>>> *nvmem_rw_dev_groups[] = {
>>> &nvmem_bin_rw_group,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
>>> nvmem_bin_ro_group = {
>>> .attrs = nvmem_attrs,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_dev_groups[] = {
>>> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
>>> *nvmem_ro_dev_groups[] = {
>>> &nvmem_bin_ro_group,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
>>> nvmem_bin_rw_root_group = {
>>> .attrs = nvmem_attrs,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups[] = {
>>> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
>>> *nvmem_rw_root_dev_groups[] = {
>>> &nvmem_bin_rw_root_group,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group
>>> nvmem_bin_ro_root_group = {
>>> .attrs = nvmem_attrs,
>>> };
>>>
>>> -static const struct attribute_group *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
>>> +static const __maybe_unused struct attribute_group
>>> *nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups[] = {
>>> &nvmem_bin_ro_root_group,
>>> NULL,
>>> };
>>> @@ -688,6 +688,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
>>> nvmem_config *config)
>>> nvmem->read_only = device_property_present(config->dev,
>>> "read-only") |
>>> config->read_only;
>>>
>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_NVMEM_NO_SYSFS_ENTRY)
>>> if (config->root_only)
>>> nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem->read_only ?
>>> nvmem_ro_root_dev_groups :
>>> @@ -696,7 +697,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
>>> nvmem_config *config)
>>> nvmem->dev.groups = nvmem->read_only ?
>>> nvmem_ro_dev_groups :
>>> nvmem_rw_dev_groups;
>>> -
>>> +#endif
>>> device_initialize(&nvmem->dev);
>>>
>>> dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n",
>>> config->name);
>>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists