[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190401170047.746995726@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 19:01:37 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 022/107] tun: properly test for IFF_UP
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 4477138fa0ae4e1b699786ef0600863ea6e6c61c ]
Same reasons than the ones explained in commit 4179cb5a4c92
("vxlan: test dev->flags & IFF_UP before calling netif_rx()")
netif_rx_ni() or napi_gro_frags() must be called under a strict contract.
At device dismantle phase, core networking clears IFF_UP
and flush_all_backlogs() is called after rcu grace period
to make sure no incoming packet might be in a cpu backlog
and still referencing the device.
A similar protocol is used for gro layer.
Most drivers call netif_rx() from their interrupt handler,
and since the interrupts are disabled at device dismantle,
netif_rx() does not have to check dev->flags & IFF_UP
Virtual drivers do not have this guarantee, and must
therefore make the check themselves.
Fixes: 1bd4978a88ac ("tun: honor IFF_UP in tun_get_user()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1403,9 +1403,6 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_s
u32 rxhash;
int skb_xdp = 1;
- if (!(tun->dev->flags & IFF_UP))
- return -EIO;
-
if (!(tun->flags & IFF_NO_PI)) {
if (len < sizeof(pi))
return -EINVAL;
@@ -1493,9 +1490,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_s
err = skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(skb, 0, from, len);
if (err) {
+ err = -EFAULT;
+drop:
this_cpu_inc(tun->pcpu_stats->rx_dropped);
kfree_skb(skb);
- return -EFAULT;
+ return err;
}
}
@@ -1566,11 +1565,19 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_s
}
rxhash = __skb_get_hash_symmetric(skb);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (unlikely(!(tun->dev->flags & IFF_UP))) {
+ err = -EIO;
+ goto drop;
+ }
+
#ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS
tun_rx_batched(tun, tfile, skb, more);
#else
netif_rx_ni(skb);
#endif
+ rcu_read_unlock();
stats = get_cpu_ptr(tun->pcpu_stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists