[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190402204038.GM31303@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:40:38 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yu-cheng.yu@...el.com,
Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] KVM:CPUID: Add CET CPUID support for Guest
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:03:45PM +0800, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> CET SHSTK and IBT capability are reported via
> CPUID.(EAX=7, ECX=0):ECX[bit 7] and EDX[bit 20] respectively.
> CR4.CET[bit 23] is CET master enable bit, it controls CET feature
> enabling. CET user mode and supervisor mode xsaves component size
> is reported via CPUID.(EAX=0xD, ECX=1):ECX[bit 11] and ECX[bit 12]
> respectively.
>
> Note: Although SHSTK or IBT can be enabled independently,
> both of them are controlled by CR4.CET.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi Z <yi.z.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++-
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 6 +++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 55e51ff7e421..fc038bf1924a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,8 @@
> | X86_CR4_PGE | X86_CR4_PCE | X86_CR4_OSFXSR | X86_CR4_PCIDE \
> | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE | X86_CR4_SMEP | X86_CR4_FSGSBASE \
> | X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT | X86_CR4_LA57 | X86_CR4_VMXE \
> - | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE | X86_CR4_UMIP))
> + | X86_CR4_SMAP | X86_CR4_PKE | X86_CR4_UMIP \
> + | X86_CR4_CET))
>
> #define CR8_RESERVED_BITS (~(unsigned long)X86_CR8_TPR)
>
> @@ -1185,6 +1186,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
>
> int (*nested_enable_evmcs)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> uint16_t *vmcs_version);
> + u64 (*vmx_supported_xss)(void);
Heh, the purpose of kvm_x86_ops is to abstract things a bit, i.e. drop
the "vmx" prefix.
> };
>
> struct kvm_arch_async_pf {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists