[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904021709340.24692@pianoman.cluster.toy>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:13:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] x86/perf/amd: AMD PMC counters and NMI
latency
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> You know, running fuzzer on p4 might worth in anycase. As to potential
> problems to fix -- i could try find some time slot for, still quite
> limited too 'cause of many other duties :(
Well I fired up the Pentium 4
/dev/sda1 has gone 1457 days without being checked
and eventually got it up to date (running "git pull" in a 5-year old Linux
tree plus running "apt-get dist-upgrade" at the same time was maybe a
mistake on a system with 1GB of RAM).
Anyway I have it fuzzing current git and surprisingly while it's hit a few
WARNINGs and some NMI dazed+confused messages it hasn't actually crashed
yet. Not sure if I want to let it fuzz overnight if I'm not here though.
Shame on Intel though for not providing perf JSON files for the
Pentium 4 event names.
Vince
Powered by blists - more mailing lists