lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dde15cd2-5c17-86b0-68a7-638b3d1a3de9@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:55:01 +0800
From:   Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.de>
To:     Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>, dsterba@...e.cz,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>, lkp@...org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@...ech.edu>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [btrfs] 70d28b0e4f:
 BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_early-boot_stage,
 last_printk:Probing_EDD(edd=off_to_disable)...ok



On 2019/4/2 上午11:14, Rong Chen wrote:
> 
> On 4/1/19 11:40 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:02:37PM +0800,  Chen, Rong A  wrote:
>>> On 4/1/2019 10:29 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>> On 2019/4/1 下午10:02,  Chen, Rong A  wrote:
>>>>> On 4/1/2019 9:28 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>>>> On 1.04.19 г. 16:24 ч., kernel test robot wrote:
>>>>>>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commit: 70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102 ("btrfs:
>>>>>>> tree-checker: Verify dev item")
>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
>>>>>>> master
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in testcase: trinity
>>>>>>> with following parameters:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       runtime: 300s
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> test-description: Trinity is a linux system call fuzz tester.
>>>>>>> test-url: http://codemonkey.org.uk/projects/trinity/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge
>>>>>>> -smp
>>>>>>> 2 -m 2G
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire
>>>>>>> log/backtrace):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> | 36b9d2bc69 | 70d28b0e4f |
>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> boot_successes
>>>>>>> | 14         | 0          |
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> boot_failures
>>>>>>> | 2          | 14         |
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> IP-Config:Auto-configuration_of_network_failed
>>>>>>> | 2          |            |
>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>> BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_early-boot_stage,last_printk:Probing_EDD(edd=off_to_disable)...ok
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> | 0          | 14         |
>>>>>>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> early console in setup code
>>>>>>> Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok
>>>>>>> BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in early-boot stage, last printk:
>>>>>>> Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok
>>>>>>> Linux version 5.0.0-rc8-00196-g70d28b0 #1
>>>>>>> Command line: ip=::::vm-snb-quantal-x86_64-1415::dhcp root=/dev/ram0
>>>>>>> user=lkp
>>>>>>> job=/lkp/jobs/scheduled/vm-snb-quantal-x86_64-1415/trinity-300s-quantal-core-x86_64-2018-11-09.cgz-70d28b0-20190330-29362-1y6g0qb-2.yaml
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ARCH=x86_64 kconfig=x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928
>>>>>>> branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2019032317
>>>>>>> commit=70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102
>>>>>>> BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928/gcc-7/70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102/vmlinuz-5.0.0-rc8-00196-g70d28b0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> max_uptime=1500
>>>>>>> RESULT_ROOT=/result/trinity/300s/vm-snb-quantal-x86_64/quantal-core-x86_64-2018-11-09.cgz/x86_64-randconfig-s5-03231928/gcc-7/70d28b0e4f8ed2d38571e7b1f9bec7f321a53102/8
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LKP_SERVER=inn debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled
>>>>>>> rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100 net.ifnames=0 printk.devkmsg=on
>>>>>>> panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic
>>>>>>> load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0 drbd.minor_count=8
>>>>>>> systemd.log_level=err ignore_loglevel console=tty0
>>>>>>> earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 console=ttyS0,115200 vga=normal rw
>>>>>>> rcuperf.shutdown=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can this report be made useful by actually including output from
>>>>>> serial
>>>>>> console? For example possible bug-ons or whatnot? dmesg.xz just
>>>>>> contains
>>>>>> qemu's command line + some metadata about the test and :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in early-boot stage, last printk:
>>>>>> Probing EDD (edd=off to disable)... ok"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At least a stack trace would have been useful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> We usually use the tool ("bin/lkp qemu -k <bzImage> job-script") to
>>>>> reproduce it.  It seems no stack trace in the result:
>>>> So there is no regression at that commit right?
>>>>
>>>> Just some false alert?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think there's a regression, it stopped in the early-boot stage .
>> Can you please provide any logs that would point at btrfs? If the module
>> is loaded or built-in started, there's a line about that. Besides that
>> it's preceded by messages from other subsystems' initialization.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS and CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY is enabled in the kconfig.
> I disabled them for the experiment, and the new kernel is bootable. I
> don't have more logs to prove it.
> 
> $ grep BTRFS config-5.0.0-rc8-00196-g70d28b0
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS=y
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY is not set
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS is not set
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is not set
> # CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT is not set
> CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY=y

With the same BTRFS config, on v5.1.0-rc2+ (David's misc-next) branch,
which has the so-called "regression" commit, it booted without any problem.

So I really hope we could get some useful kernel message, either to
determine what's wrong with btrfs or what's wrong with the test framework.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Rong Chen
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LKP mailing list
>> LKP@...ts.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ