[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190402230104.105845-8-sboyd@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:01:03 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] clk: Document and simplify clk_core_get_rate_nolock()
This function uses a few gotos and doesn't explain why parents and
numbers of parents are being checked before returning different values
for the clk's rate. Document and simplify this function somewhat to make
this better.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c9860074899b..79d0466cd180 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -345,23 +345,18 @@ unsigned int __clk_get_enable_count(struct clk *clk)
static unsigned long clk_core_get_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core)
{
- unsigned long ret;
-
- if (!core) {
- ret = 0;
- goto out;
- }
-
- ret = core->rate;
-
- if (!core->num_parents)
- goto out;
+ if (!core)
+ return 0;
- if (!core->parent)
- ret = 0;
+ if (!core->num_parents || core->parent)
+ return core->rate;
-out:
- return ret;
+ /*
+ * Clk must have a parent because num_parents > 0 but the parent isn't
+ * known yet. Best to return 0 as the rate of this clk until we can
+ * properly recalc the rate based on the parent's rate.
+ */
+ return 0;
}
unsigned long clk_hw_get_rate(const struct clk_hw *hw)
--
Sent by a computer through tubes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists