[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190402102733.GD2960@kunai>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:27:34 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] i2c: iproc: add NIC I2C support
> +#define IDM_CTRL_DIRECT_OFFSET 0x00
And this IDM thing is also never used outside of the I2C context? In
other words, it also doesn't need a seperate DT node?
> + /* indicates no slave mode support */
> + bool no_slave;
I would suggest to not use a flag, but to nullify the {un}reg_slave
callbacks in probe depending on the type. That will also tell the
i2c-core that slave functionality is not supported. And you can use if
(!algo->reg_slave) as a flag, too.
> + iproc_i2c->type =
> + (enum bcm_iproc_i2c_type) of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
No need to cast a void*.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists