linux-kernel - [PATCH v8 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190402104153.25404-11-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Date:   Tue,  2 Apr 2019 11:41:46 +0100
From:   Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with()

So far uclamp_util() allows to clamp a specified utilization considering
the clamp values requested by RUNNABLE tasks in a CPU. For the Energy
Aware Scheduler (EAS) it is interesting to test how clamp values will
change when a task is becoming RUNNABLE on a given CPU.
For example, EAS is interested in comparing the energy impact of
different scheduling decisions and the clamp values can play a role on
that.

Add uclamp_util_with() which allows to clamp a given utilization by
considering the possible impact on CPU clamp values of a specified task.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>

---
Changes in v8:
 Others:
 - s/uclamp_effective_value()/uclamp_eff_value()/
---
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index b4c13f3beb2f..a1ed3d94652a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2276,11 +2276,20 @@ static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
-static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+unsigned int uclamp_eff_value(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id);
+
+static __always_inline
+unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+			      struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	unsigned int min_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MIN].value);
 	unsigned int max_util = READ_ONCE(rq->uclamp[UCLAMP_MAX].value);
 
+	if (p) {
+		min_util = max(min_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN));
+		max_util = max(max_util, uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX));
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Since CPU's {min,max}_util clamps are MAX aggregated considering
 	 * RUNNABLE tasks with _different_ clamps, we can end up with an
@@ -2291,7 +2300,17 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
 
 	return clamp(util, min_util, max_util);
 }
+
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
+{
+	return uclamp_util_with(rq, util, NULL);
+}
 #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
+static inline unsigned int uclamp_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util,
+					    struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return util;
+}
 static inline unsigned int uclamp_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int util)
 {
 	return util;
-- 
2.20.1