lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b250c876-11d8-5558-9650-d75061d67919@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:34:18 -0500
From:   Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, atull@...nel.org,
        richard.gong@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: Intel: Add Stratix10 ECC DBE SMC call

On 4/2/19 3:55 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 09:43:58AM -0500, thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> Reserve ECC Double Bit Error SMC call to alert U-Boot that
>> a DBE has occurred. Moving the call from local EDAC header
>> file to this common file.
> 
> Is there any particular reason this needs to be two patches or can I
> merge them into one?
> 

Yes, they can be merged into one. I split into 2 patches since the 1st 
required the firmware directory sign-off and the 2nd required your EDAC 
sign-off. I see your point, it could have been 1 patch.

Thanks for reviewing,

Thor

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ