[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1554212307.662996047@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:38:27 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Chris Mason" <clm@...com>, "Miao Xie" <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
"Yang Dongsheng" <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 36/99] Btrfs: fill ->last_trans for delayed inode in
btrfs_fill_inode.
3.16.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yang Dongsheng <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
commit 6e17d30bfaf43e04d991392d8484f1c556810c33 upstream.
We need to fill inode when we found a node for it in delayed_nodes_tree.
But we did not fill the ->last_trans currently, it will cause the test
of xfstest/generic/311 fail. Scenario of the 311 is shown as below:
Problem:
(1). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
(2). pwrite(test_fd, buf, 4096, 0)
(3). close(test_fd)
(4). drop_all_caches() <-------- "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
(5). test_fd = open(fname, O_RDWR|O_DIRECT)
(6). fsync(test_fd);
<-------- we did not get the correct log entry for the file
Reason:
When we re-open this file in (5), we would find a node
in delayed_nodes_tree and fill the inode we are lookup with the
information. But the ->last_trans is not filled, then the fsync()
will check the ->last_trans and found it's 0 then say this inode
is already in our tree which is commited, not recording the extents
for it.
Fix:
This patch fill the ->last_trans properly and set the
runtime_flags if needed in this situation. Then we can get the
log entries we expected after (6) and generic/311 passed.
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c | 2 ++
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c
@@ -1801,6 +1801,8 @@ int btrfs_fill_inode(struct inode *inode
set_nlink(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_nlink(inode_item));
inode_set_bytes(inode, btrfs_stack_inode_nbytes(inode_item));
BTRFS_I(inode)->generation = btrfs_stack_inode_generation(inode_item);
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = btrfs_stack_inode_transid(inode_item);
+
inode->i_version = btrfs_stack_inode_sequence(inode_item);
inode->i_rdev = 0;
*rdev = btrfs_stack_inode_rdev(inode_item);
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -3511,25 +3511,28 @@ static void btrfs_read_locked_inode(stru
BTRFS_I(inode)->generation = btrfs_inode_generation(leaf, inode_item);
BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans = btrfs_inode_transid(leaf, inode_item);
+ inode->i_version = btrfs_inode_sequence(leaf, inode_item);
+ inode->i_generation = BTRFS_I(inode)->generation;
+ inode->i_rdev = 0;
+ rdev = btrfs_inode_rdev(leaf, inode_item);
+
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = (u64)-1;
+ BTRFS_I(inode)->flags = btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, inode_item);
+
+cache_index:
/*
* If we were modified in the current generation and evicted from memory
* and then re-read we need to do a full sync since we don't have any
* idea about which extents were modified before we were evicted from
* cache.
+ *
+ * This is required for both inode re-read from disk and delayed inode
+ * in delayed_nodes_tree.
*/
if (BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans == root->fs_info->generation)
set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC,
&BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags);
- inode->i_version = btrfs_inode_sequence(leaf, inode_item);
- inode->i_generation = BTRFS_I(inode)->generation;
- inode->i_rdev = 0;
- rdev = btrfs_inode_rdev(leaf, inode_item);
-
- BTRFS_I(inode)->index_cnt = (u64)-1;
- BTRFS_I(inode)->flags = btrfs_inode_flags(leaf, inode_item);
-
-cache_index:
path->slots[0]++;
if (inode->i_nlink != 1 ||
path->slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists