[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1554212308.766426374@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:38:28 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 91/99] ext4: avoid kernel warning when writing the
superblock to a dead device
3.16.65-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
commit e86807862e6880809f191c4cea7f88a489f0ed34 upstream.
The xfstests generic/475 test switches the underlying device with
dm-error while running a stress test. This results in a large number
of file system errors, and since we can't lock the buffer head when
marking the superblock dirty in the ext4_grp_locked_error() case, it's
possible the superblock to be !buffer_uptodate() without
buffer_write_io_error() being true.
We need to set buffer_uptodate() before we call mark_buffer_dirty() or
this will trigger a WARN_ON. It's safe to do this since the
superblock must have been properly read into memory or the mount would
have been successful. So if buffer_uptodate() is not set, we can
safely assume that this happened due to a failed attempt to write the
superblock.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4712,7 +4712,7 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct supe
BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
ext4_superblock_csum_set(sb);
lock_buffer(sbh);
- if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh) || !buffer_uptodate(sbh)) {
/*
* Oh, dear. A previous attempt to write the
* superblock failed. This could happen because the
Powered by blists - more mailing lists