linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: use nand

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAT_tum_v5QwxDbz3Cmb4LwJ1BSY0mPTzzE3nc6SOE-Bng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:48:09 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] mtd: rawnand: denali: use nand_chip pointer more
 for internal functions

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:14 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com> wrote on Sat, 30 Mar
> 2019 15:23:23 +0100:
>
> > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 16:28:13 +0900
> > Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> >
> > > With the recent refactoring, the NAND driver hooks now take a pointer
> > > to nand_chip. Add to_denali() in order to convert (struct nand_chip *)
> > > to (struct denali_nand_info *) directly. It is more useful than the
> > > current mtd_to_denali().
> > >
> > > I changed some helper functions to take (struct nand_chip *). This will
> > > avoid pointer conversion back and forth, and ease further development.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Changes in v4: None
> > > Changes in v3: None
> > > Changes in v2: None
> > >
> > >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> > > index 24aeafc..4ac1314 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
> > > @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ static inline struct denali_nand_info *mtd_to_denali(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> > >     return container_of(mtd_to_nand(mtd), struct denali_nand_info, nand);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static struct denali_nand_info *to_denali(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > > +{
> > > +   return container_of(chip, struct denali_nand_info, nand);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  /*
> > >   * Direct Addressing - the slave address forms the control information (command
> > >   * type, bank, block, and page address).  The slave data is the actual data to
> > > @@ -282,12 +287,12 @@ static void denali_cmd_ctrl(struct nand_chip *chip, int dat, unsigned int ctrl)
> > >     denali->host_write(denali, DENALI_BANK(denali) | type, dat);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> > > -                               struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf,
> > > +static int denali_check_erased_page(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > > +                               struct denali_nand_info *denali, u8 *buf,
> >
> > You don't need to pass both chip and denali, as one can be extracted
> > from the other.
> >
> > >                                 unsigned long uncor_ecc_flags,
> > >                                 unsigned int max_bitflips)
> > >  {
> > > -   struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
> > > +   struct mtd_ecc_stats *ecc_stats = &nand_to_mtd(chip)->ecc_stats;
> > >     uint8_t *ecc_code = chip->oob_poi + denali->oob_skip_bytes;
> > >     int ecc_steps = chip->ecc.steps;
> > >     int ecc_size = chip->ecc.size;
> > > @@ -303,9 +308,9 @@ static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> > >                                               NULL, 0,
> > >                                               chip->ecc.strength);
> > >             if (stat < 0) {
> > > -                   mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
> > > +                   ecc_stats->failed++;
> > >             } else {
> > > -                   mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
> > > +                   ecc_stats->corrected += stat;
> > >                     max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
> > >             }
> > >
> > > @@ -316,11 +321,11 @@ static int denali_check_erased_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> > >     return max_bitflips;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> > > +static int denali_hw_ecc_fixup(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > >                            struct denali_nand_info *denali,
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
>
> I am fine with the series in its current state, please submit a v5
> with Boris comment's addressed and I'll queue it right away to next.
>


OK, I will submit v5 shortly.




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada