[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190402155149.c23ivzzc5hyykokl@treble>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:51:49 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/14] x86/dumpstack/64: Speedup in_exception_stack()
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:48:56PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > With the above "(stk <= begin || stk >= end)" check, removing the loop
> > becomes not all that important since exception stack dumps are quite
> > rare and not performance sensitive. With all the macros this code
> > becomes a little more obtuse, so I'm not sure whether removal of the
> > loop is a net positive.
>
> What about perf? It's NMI context and probably starts from there. Peter?
I believe perf unwinds starting from the regs from the context which was
interrupted by the NMI.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists