lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:46:50 +0700
From:   Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] qcom: dts: thermal cleanups

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:58 PM Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr> wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2019 11:12, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Devices that are not associated with cooling-maps use the 'hot' type
> > - Remove critical trip from such devices too and restrict that type of CPUs
> > - For 8916, add the sensor on the modem
> >
> > Description:
> > - Expose all temperature sensors on msm8916, msm996, msm8998, sdm845
> > - split up the register address map for msm8998
> > - standardize names of the various thermal-zones across boards to make it
> >   easy for test scripts to parse
>
> This is what I see on msm8998 with your patch series applied on top of
> yesterday's next:
>
> # dmesg | grep of_parse_thermal_zones
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu0-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu1-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu2-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu3-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu4-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu5-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu6-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cpu7-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-bottom zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build gpu-thermal-top zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster0-mhm-thermal zone -22
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-mhm-thermal zone -22
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build cluster1-l2-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build modem-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build mem-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build wlan-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build q6-dsp-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build camera-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build multimedia-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build pm8998 zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build battery-thermal zone 0
> of_parse_thermal_zones: build skin-thermal zone 0
>
> NB: -EINVAL for cluster0-mhm-thermal and cluster1-mhm-thermal
>
>
> # cat /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone*/temp
> 35800
> 35200
> 34500
> 34800
> 34500
> 34100
> 34100
> 33500
> 33800
> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone17/temp: Invalid argument
> 36100
> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone19/temp: Invalid argument
> 35500
> 36100
> 35800
> 35200
> 35500
> 36100
> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone8/temp: Invalid argument
> cat: /sys/devices/virtual/thermal/thermal_zone9/temp: Invalid argument
>
>
> Are the failures expected?
> (cluster*-mhm-thermal and thermal_zone*/temp)

No they are not. Unfortunately, I didn't have HW to test, so
appreciate the help with testing. I'll check the 8, 9, 17 and 19 again
before resubmitting.

Regards,
Amit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ