[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bm1moq7i.fsf@anholt.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:15:29 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/vc4: Disable V3D interactions if the v3d component didn't probe.
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 11:35 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> One might want to use the VC4 display stack without using Mesa.
>> Similar to the debugfs fixes for not having all of the possible
>> display bits enabled, make sure you can't oops in vc4 if v3d isn't
>> enabled.
>
> Just thought about this: perhaps we should be returning -ENODEV instead
> of -EINVAL when !vc4->v3d, just so that the error is a bit more
> explicit to userspace?
I like it. Doing that while applying the series.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists