[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190403194720.GY2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:47:21 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/24] Convert vfs.txt to vfs.rst
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 06:25:20AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:48:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:49:34AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:16:53 +1100
> > > "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Al,
> > > >
> > > > This series converts the VFS file Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt to
> > > > reStructuredText format. Please consider taking this series through
> > > > your tree as apposed to Jon's tree because this set makes a fair amount
> > > > of changes to VFS files (and also the VFS tree and docs tree are out of
> > > > sync right now with the recent work by Mauro and Neil).
> > >
> > > Al, do you have any thoughts on how you want to handle this? I was about
> > > to apply Jeff Layton's vfs.txt update, but would rather not create
> > > conflicts unnecessarily. Let me know if you'd like me to pick this work
> > > up.
> >
> > Frankly, I would rather see that file be eventually replaced by something
> > saner, and I'm not talking about the format.
>
> Are you able to extrapolate on this comment please? Is this something
> someone new to the VFS (me) can do with a little nudge in the right
> direction or is this something that needs thorough knowledge of the VFS?
Put it that way - IMO the best way to do it is not a list of methods with
explanations what each does, but a bunch of per-data structure documents
describing their life cycles. The fundamental ones for VFS would be
* inode
* dentry
* super_block
* (vfs)mount
* file
* files_struct
Having a list of methods is nice, but those would be better off with short
description along with "see <document> for details, including the locking,
etc."; said short descriptions make little sense without the background...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists