linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: fix rfkill functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190403220358.GD39081@wrath>
Date:   Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:03:58 -0700
From:   Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:     Mario.Limonciello@...l.com
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: fix rfkill functionality

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:54:27PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@...l.com wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 3:24 PM
> > To: Limonciello, Mario
> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko; LKML; platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-laptop: fix rfkill functionality
> > 
> > 
> > [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> > 
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 09:25:34AM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> > > When converting the driver two arguments were transposed leading
> > > to rfkill not working.
> > >
> > > BugLink: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201427
> > > Reported-by: Pepijn de Vos <pepijndevos@...il.com>
> > > Fixes: 549b49 ("platform/x86: dell-smbios: Introduce dispatcher for SMM calls")
> > > Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
> > > Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
> > 
> > Looks like this broken in 4.14? So Cc stable back to then? I'm surprised it's
> > been broken that long :-(
> > 
> 
> Not many "newer" platforms actually use this radio control anymore.  It's been
> superseded by other technologies.  So I think that would be the main reason.
> 
> Can you CC it to stable when it's committed or do I need to re-send or anything?
> 

I will add the Cc to stable. Just wanted to confirm our expectations were
aligned.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center