[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190403234356.GA11098@hao-dev>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 07:43:56 +0800
From: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
To: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc: atull@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] fpga: dfl: fme: add thermal management support
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:09:09AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Hi Hao,
>
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:31:47AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 07:59:25AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> > > Hi Wu,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:07:41AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > > This patch adds support to thermal management private feature for DFL
> > > > FPGA Management Engine (FME). As thermal throttling is handled by
> > > > hardware automatically per pre-defined thresholds, this private
> > > > feature driver only provides read-only sysfs interfaces for user
> > > > to read temperature, thresholds, threshold policy and other info.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dfl-fme | 56 +++++++
> > > > drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 258 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dfl-fme b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dfl-fme
> > > > index b8327e9..d3aeb88 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dfl-fme
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-platform-dfl-fme
> > > > @@ -44,3 +44,59 @@ Description: Read-only. It returns socket_id to indicate which socket
> > > > this FPGA belongs to, only valid for integrated solution.
> > > > User only needs this information, in case standard numa node
> > > > can't provide correct information.
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/temperature
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. It returns temperature (in Celsius) of this FPGA
> > > > + device.
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/threshold1
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. Read this file to get the temperature threshold1
> > > > + (in Celsius).
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/threshold2
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. Read this file to get the temperature threshold2
> > > > + (in Celsius).
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/trip_threshold
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. It returns trip threshold (in Celsius), once FPGA
> > > > + temperature reaches trip threshold, it triggers a fatal event
> > > > + to board management controller (BMC) to shutdown FPGA.
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/threshold1_status
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. It returns 1 if temperature reaches threshold1,
> > > > + otherwise 0. Once temperature reaches threshold1, hardware
> > > > + will automatically enter throttling state (AP1 - 50%
> > > > + or AP2 - 90% throttling, see 'threshold1_policy').
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/threshold2_status
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. It returns 1 if temperature reaches threshold2,
> > > > + otherwise 0. Once temperature reaches threshold2, hardware
> > > > + will automatically enter the deepest throttling state (AP6
> > > > + - 100% throttling).
> > > > +
> > > > +What: /sys/bus/platform/devices/dfl-fme.0/thermal_mgmt/threshold1_policy
> > > > +Date: March 2019
> > > > +KernelVersion: 5.2
> > > > +Contact: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > +Description: Read-only. Read this file to get the policy of temperature
> > > > + threshold1. It only supports two value (policy):
> > > > + 0 - AP2 state (90% throttling)
> > > > + 1 - AP1 state (50% throttling)
> > >
> > > These look like they could directly map to the linux thermal framework,
> > > any reason you can't use the thermal framework?
> > >
> > > The trip stuff literally maps 1:1 to what a thermal driver does, I think
> > > that's something you'd wanna consider.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Moritz,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the suggestion, actually I feel that the trip points in thermal
> > zone are used to indicate cooling actions required for thermal software either
> > in kernel or userspace. But in this case, such FPGA hardware handles cooling
> > automatically (yes, driver only expose Read-only sysfs for information), so
> > software doesn't need to take care of this at all. For this purpose, it seems
> > that we don't have to put these thresholds as trip points. And per my
> > understanding, if people use such FPGA device, then they may need to know
> > what's the current hardware throttling behavior, e.g. 50% vs 90%. These
> > information can't be provided by standard thermal zone sysfs, so anyway user
> > needs these sysfs interfaces to know it. But it seems that we still could
> > create a thermal zone without trip points, it could help if user wants to
> > connect some external cooling devices via userspace thermal daemon, they can
> > define whatever trip points they like to activate the external cooling
> > device. I will consider this further more and come up with a new patch in
> > v2 patchset.
>
> Generally speaking extending an existing framework with the
> functionality you want is preferable over rolling 100% your own.
>
> So please look into this.
Yes, agree, will look into this and try to fix this in next version.
Thanks for the comments.
Hao
>
> Thanks,
> Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists