lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:12:32 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm,memory_hotplug: allocate memmap from hotadded
 memory

On Wed 03-04-19 10:01:16, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:48:45PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > So what is going to happen when you hotadd two memblocks. The first one
> > holds memmaps and then you want to hotremove (not just offline) it?
> 
> If you hot-add two memblocks, this means that either:
> 
> a) you hot-add a 256MB-memory-device (128MB per memblock)
> b) you hot-add two 128MB-memory-device
> 
> Either way, hot-removing only works for memory-device as a whole, so
> there is no problem.
> 
> Vmemmaps are created per hot-added operations, this means that
> vmemmaps will be created for the hot-added range.
> And since hot-add/hot-remove operations works with the same granularity,
> there is no problem.

What does prevent calling somebody arch_add_memory for a range spanning
multiple memblocks from a driver directly. In other words aren't you
making  assumptions about a future usage based on the qemu usecase?

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ