lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:03:34 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mfd: da9063: remove leftover platform_data
 definitions

On Wed, 03 Apr 2019, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 09:07:58AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > > Not used, not needed, remove them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h | 65 ----------------------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 65 deletions(-)
> > >  delete mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/da9063/pdata.h
> > 
> > Can't take this until the last user has been removed.
> > 
> > But for now:
> > 
> > For my own reference:
> >   Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> As I wrote in the cover-letter, I'd vote for all patches going in via
> MFD. Is that fine with you? Then I'll ping other maintainers for acks.

That's fine by me too.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ