| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:55:00 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] hwmon: pwm-fan: Add RPM support via external
interrupt
Hi Guenter,
Am 02.04.19 um 22:55 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:21:50PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> This adds RPM support to the pwm-fan driver in order to use with
>> fancontrol/pwmconfig. This feature is intended for fans with a tachometer
>> output signal, which generate a defined number of pulses per revolution.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
>> index 167221c..3245a49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/hwmon.h>
>> #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@
>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> #include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +#include <linux/timer.h>
>>
>> #define MAX_PWM 255
>>
>> @@ -33,6 +35,14 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>> struct mutex lock;
>> struct pwm_device *pwm;
>> struct regulator *reg_en;
>> +
>> + int irq;
>> + atomic_t pulses;
>> + unsigned int rpm;
>> + u8 pulses_per_revolution;
>> + ktime_t sample_start;
>> + struct timer_list rpm_timer;
>> +
>> unsigned int pwm_value;
>> unsigned int pwm_fan_state;
>> unsigned int pwm_fan_max_state;
>> @@ -40,6 +50,32 @@ struct pwm_fan_ctx {
>> struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>> };
>>
>> +/* This handler assumes self resetting edge triggered interrupt. */
>> +static irqreturn_t pulse_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_id;
>> +
>> + atomic_inc(&ctx->pulses);
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void sample_timer(struct timer_list *t)
>> +{
>> + struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = from_timer(ctx, t, rpm_timer);
>> + int pulses;
>> + u64 tmp;
>> +
>> + pulses = atomic_read(&ctx->pulses);
>> + atomic_sub(pulses, &ctx->pulses);
>> + tmp = (u64)pulses * ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), ctx->sample_start) * 60;
>> + do_div(tmp, ctx->pulses_per_revolution * 1000);
>> + ctx->rpm = tmp;
>> +
>> + ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
>> + mod_timer(&ctx->rpm_timer, jiffies + HZ);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __set_pwm(struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx, unsigned long pwm)
>> {
>> unsigned long period;
>> @@ -100,15 +136,49 @@ static ssize_t pwm_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", ctx->pwm_value);
>> }
>>
>> +static ssize_t rpm_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", ctx->rpm);
>> +}
>>
>> static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pwm1, pwm, 0);
>> +static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR_RO(fan1_input, rpm, 0);
>>
>> static struct attribute *pwm_fan_attrs[] = {
>> &sensor_dev_attr_pwm1.dev_attr.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_fan1_input.dev_attr.attr,
>> NULL,
>> };
>>
>> -ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(pwm_fan);
>> +static umode_t pwm_fan_attrs_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a,
>> + int n)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = container_of(kobj, struct device, kobj);
>> + struct pwm_fan_ctx *ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + struct device_attribute *devattr;
>> +
>> + /* Hide fan_input in case no interrupt is available */
>> + devattr = container_of(a, struct device_attribute, attr);
>> + if (devattr == &sensor_dev_attr_fan1_input.dev_attr) {
>> + if (ctx->irq <= 0)
>> + return 0;
>> + }
> Side note: This can be easier written as
> if (n == 1 && ctx->irq <= 0)
> return 0;
>
> Not that it matters much.
>
>> +
>> + return a->mode;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group pwm_fan_group = {
>> + .attrs = pwm_fan_attrs,
>> + .is_visible = pwm_fan_attrs_visible,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group *pwm_fan_groups[] = {
>> + &pwm_fan_group,
>> + NULL,
>> +};
>>
>> /* thermal cooling device callbacks */
>> static int pwm_fan_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>> @@ -261,17 +331,45 @@ static int pwm_fan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err_reg_disable;
>> }
>>
>> + timer_setup(&ctx->rpm_timer, sample_timer, 0);
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u8(pdev->dev.of_node, "pulses-per-revolution",
> This does not work: The property is not defined as u8. You have to either
> use of_property_read_u32() or declare the property as u8.
pulses_per_revolution is defined as u8 since this version
>
> [ Sorry, I didn't know until recently that this is necessary ]
>
>> + &ctx->pulses_per_revolution)) {
>> + ctx->pulses_per_revolution = 2;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ctx->pulses_per_revolution) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pulses-per-revolution can't be zero.\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto err_pwm_disable;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ctx->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + if (ctx->irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> + ret = ctx->irq;
>> + goto err_pwm_disable;
> It might be better to call platform_get_irq() and to do do this check
> first, before enabling the regulator (in practice before calling
> devm_regulator_get_optional). It doesn't make sense to enable the
> regulator only to disable it because the irq is not yet available.
>
>> + } else if (ctx->irq > 0) {
> As written, this else is unnecessary, and static checkers will complain
> about it.
>
>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, ctx->irq, pulse_handler, 0,
>> + pdev->name, ctx);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't get interrupt working.\n");
>> + goto err_pwm_disable;
>> + }
>> + ctx->sample_start = ktime_get();
>> + mod_timer(&ctx->rpm_timer, jiffies + HZ);
>> + }
>> +
>> hwmon = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups(&pdev->dev, "pwmfan",
>> ctx, pwm_fan_groups);
>> if (IS_ERR(hwmon)) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register hwmon device\n");
>> ret = PTR_ERR(hwmon);
>> - goto err_pwm_disable;
>> + goto err_del_timer;
>> }
>>
>> ret = pwm_fan_of_get_cooling_data(&pdev->dev, ctx);
>> if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + goto err_del_timer;
> Outch. This is buggy and should have been "goto err_pwm_disable;".
> It needs to be fixed with a separate patch, and first, so we can
> backport it. Can you do that ?
Sure
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists