[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d0e8f12-baaa-e4af-f1d2-03e0508e3fd1@web.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:50:44 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [4/7] cpufreq: maple: Checking implementation of
maple_cpufreq_init()
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static int __init maple_cpufreq_init(void)
> */
> valp = of_get_property(cpunode, "clock-frequency", NULL);
> if (!valp)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + goto bail_noprops;
> max_freq = (*valp)/1000;
> maple_cpu_freqs[0].frequency = max_freq;
> maple_cpu_freqs[1].frequency = max_freq/2;
* How do you think about use the jump label “put_node” instead?
* Would you like to reduce a bit of duplicate source code at the end
of this function?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/cpufreq/maple-cpufreq.c?id=bf97b82f37c6d90e16de001d0659644c57fa490d#n232
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists