[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190403151404.26542-3-jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:14:04 +0200
From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To: maxime.ripard@...tlin.com, wens@...e.org
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jernej.skrabec@...l.net
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: sunxi-ng: nkmp: Explain why zero width check is needed
Add an explanation why zero width check is needed when generating factor
mask using GENMASK() macro.
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
index 69dfc6de1c4e..cbcdf664f336 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkmp.c
@@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static int ccu_nkmp_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
ccu_nkmp_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkmp);
+ /*
+ * If width is 0, GENMASK() macro may not generate expected mask (0)
+ * as it falls under undefined behaviour by C standard due to shifts
+ * which are equal or greater than width of left operand. This can
+ * be easily avoided by explicitly checking if width is 0.
+ */
if (nkmp->n.width)
n_mask = GENMASK(nkmp->n.width + nkmp->n.shift - 1,
nkmp->n.shift);
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists