[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190403121640.70128095@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:16:40 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: WARN_ON: userstacktrace on irq events
Juri reported this from the -rt kernel, but I can easily trigger it in
mainline. By simply doing:
# cd /sys/kernel/tracing
# echo 1 > options/userstacktrace
# echo 1 > events/irq/enable
With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP enabled, we get a WARNING splat of:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1688 at arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:180 save_stack_trace_user+0x12b/0x140
Modules linked in: iptable_mangle xt_CHECKSUM tun
CPU: 1 PID: 1688 Comm: sshd Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3-test+ #14
Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF/339A, BIOS K01 v03.03 07/14/2016
RIP: 0010:save_stack_trace_user+0x12b/0x140
Code: 44 8d 58 01 44 89 1f 48 89 34 c2 8b 07 89 c2 8b 77 04 49 39 ca 74 ad 4c 89 d1 39 f0 0f 82 37 ff ff ff c3 89 c2 8b 77 04 eb 9a <0f> 0b e9 3b ff ff ff 31 f6 e9 70 ff ff ff 8b 17 8b 77 04 eb 85 0f
RSP: 0000:ffff8880d0687e40 EFLAGS: 00010006
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 1ffff1101a0d0fc9 RCX: 00007fff28a44f12
RDX: 0000000000010000 RSI: 00007faa5f81f098 RDI: ffff8880d0687e68
RBP: ffff8880cc058368 R08: ffff888085ae7f58 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffffed100f207c97 R11: ffff88807903e4bb R12: ffff88807903e468
R13: ffff88807903e46c R14: 0000000000000698 R15: ffff88807903e46c
FS: 00007faa5f43cdc0(0000) GS:ffff8880d0680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000081 CR3: 0000000085296004 CR4: 00000000001606e0
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
ftrace_trace_userstack+0x17e/0x1f0
? __trace_stack+0x80/0x80
trace_event_buffer_commit+0xd0/0x300
? trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x107/0x130
trace_event_raw_event_x86_irq_vector+0xb8/0x120
? __bpf_trace_vector_setup+0x10/0x10
? irqtime_account_irq+0x46/0xe0
? __bpf_trace_vector_setup+0x10/0x10
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x208/0x270
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20
</IRQ>
RIP: 0033:0x7faa5f81f098
Code: 89 d1 40 0f b6 c6 48 89 fa f3 aa 48 89 d0 c3 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 39 d1 0f 82 43 80 06 00 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 66 0f 6e c6 <48> 89 f8 66 0f 60 c0 66 0f 61 c0 66 0f 70 c0 00 48 83 fa 10 0f 82
RSP: 002b:00007fff28a44ef8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00005649f9d12830 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00005649f9d36240
RBP: 00007fff28a44f12 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000100
R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 00007fff28a40f90 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff28a44f58 R14: 00005649f9d12260 R15: 00005649f9d0ab40
---[ end trace cd684bbd8c344b2a ]---
hrtimer: interrupt took 3268750 ns
------------[ cut here ]------------
This is simply caused by the irq trace events doing a user stack trace:
ftrace_trace_userstack {
save_stack_trace_user {
__save_stack_trace_user {
copy_stack_frame {
access_ok {
WARN_ON_IN_IRQ()
BOOM! Warn on.
Can we make that access_ok() call in the copy_stack_frame not trigger
the warning just if we are in an interrupt?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists