[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190403162024.GE16241@sasha-vm>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:20:24 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 234/262] nfp: flower: tidy
tunnel related private data
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 11:15:49AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:01:29 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit f3b975778c176b01eba10f869a5a64c6b8550c23 ]
>>
>> Recent additions to the flower app private data have grouped the variables
>> of a given feature into a struct and added that struct to the main private
>> data struct.
>>
>> In keeping with this, move all tunnel related private data to their own
>> struct. This has no affect on functionality but improves readability and
>> maintenance of the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
>
>Not a fix.
>
>Is there a way to request patches under drivers/net/ethernet/netronome
>to only be considered if they have an explicit Fixes tag?
Yup, I can add it to my ignore list. Thanks!
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists