[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:42:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>,
Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@...c.br>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Early task context tracking
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 05:01:02PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I would much rather do the opposite: completely remove context
> tracking from the asm and, instead, stick it into the C code. We'd
> need to make sure that the C code is totally immune from tracing,
> kprobes, etc, but it would be a nice cleanup. And then you could fix
> this bug in C!
Right, so you had some prelim patches toward that a few weeks ago. Esp.
for the idtentry stuff that looked fairly straight forward.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists