[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190404094948.fumw3w53ogtd4bud@M43218.corp.atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:49:48 +0200
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
To: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
CC: <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<mojha@...eaurora.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm/mach-at91/pm : fix possible object reference leak
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 10:12:38PM +0800, Peng Hao wrote:
>
> of_find_device_by_node() takes a reference to the struct device
> when it finds a match via get_device. When returning error we should
> call put_device.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
Thanks applied to at91-fixes with:
Fixes: 24a0f5c539f9 ("ARM: at91: pm: Add sama5d2 backup mode")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v4.14+
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index 51e808a..38511a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -591,13 +591,13 @@ static int __init at91_pm_backup_init(void)
>
> np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,sama5d2-securam");
> if (!np)
> - goto securam_fail;
> + goto securam_fail_no_ref_dev;
>
> pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> of_node_put(np);
> if (!pdev) {
> pr_warn("%s: failed to find securam device!\n", __func__);
> - goto securam_fail;
> + goto securam_fail_no_ref_dev;
> }
>
> sram_pool = gen_pool_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> @@ -620,6 +620,8 @@ static int __init at91_pm_backup_init(void)
> return 0;
>
> securam_fail:
> + put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +securam_fail_no_ref_dev:
> iounmap(pm_data.sfrbu);
> pm_data.sfrbu = NULL;
> return ret;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists